Security warning to MPs on halal and kosher animal slaughter reform after David Amess murder


MPs pushing for halal and kosher slaughter reform must step up security following murder of Sir David Amess

  • Some halal and all kosher slaughterhouses do not see the animals stunned beforehand
  • Some MPs supporting the change in law said “be careful what you say publicly on the issue”
  • Also advised to review their personal safety, the Sunday Times reported










MPs supporting reform of the kosher and halal animal slaughter law have been urged to step up their security following the murder of Sir David Amess.

Currently, some animals killed to adhere to religious rules followed by Muslims and Jews are not stunned beforehand, which some welfare activists want to ban.

Now some MPs supporting a change in law that would limit the number of animals that can be slaughtered in this way have been told they should “be careful what you say publicly on this matter.”

They were also asked to review their personal safety, the Sunday Times reported.

It comes after MPs were offered security guards to watch them when they meet the public as part of a security review brought on by the murder of Tory Sir David in Southend.

Currently, some animals killed to adhere to religious rules followed by Muslims and Jews are not stunned beforehand, which some welfare activists want to ban.

It comes after MPs were offered security guards to watch over them when they meet the public as part of a security review brought on by the murder of Tory Sir David in Southend.

It comes after MPs were offered security guards to watch them when they meet the public as part of a security review brought on by the murder of Tory Sir David in Southend.

Sir David was a strong advocate for animal welfare. Now Conservative colleague Chris Loder is considering tabling an amendment to the kept animals bill that would reduce the number of non-stunning slaughterings allowed in the UK.

Speaking at the Conservative Party’s conference earlier this month, Defra Minister Victoria Prentis suggested ministers could back the move.

She said: “We have to go there with a lot of sensitivity. We are going to go there with a lot of sensitivity. It is not the policy of the government. It will be a backbench amendment.

“We will have to make sure that the rights of different religions to eat the meat they want to eat are always available.

“But there are ways to do it, so you shoot down on command. You don’t needlessly slaughter large numbers of animals without stunning them.

“So we are determined if the bill is amended in the way it could have this discussion in a sensitive and mature way.”

Halal slaughter includes both slaughter by stunning and slaughter without stunning. The Food Standards Agency said some 88 percent of animals killed in halal slaughterhouses were stunned in a way deemed acceptable to be “religiously acceptable” to many Muslims.

But not all followers of the religion agree, and the Shechita, the kosher slaughter method, does not stun animals at all.

Shechita UK campaign manager Shimon Cohen said: “We are appalled by reports that MPs were made aware of the security threats when they raised questions about the unstunned slaughter. No MPs should never feel threatened or unsafe.

“This is an important debate, and we are proud of the positive interactions we continue to have with stakeholders with a variety of perspectives, as well as with ministers, MPs, peers and politicians. responsible from all political backgrounds.

“We will continue to engage in good faith and believe that discussions can remain pragmatic, respectful and, most importantly, secure throughout the process.”

Last week, MPs learned they could use a ‘trained and accredited security guard’ during surgery in their constituency after Sir David, 69, was stabbed in one of his seats from Southend West.

MPs were warned in a joint letter from Home Secretary Priti Patel and House of Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle that their security was threatened by a “small minority of hostile individuals”.

The veteran Southend West Tories representative was killed during surgery in a constituency in Leigh-on-Sea, Essex, five years after the murder of Jo Cox of Labor in a similar scenario.

In a letter first reported by The Times, Sir Lindsay and Ms Patel wrote to MPs, acknowledging that they would be “rightly concerned for their own safety and that of their staff”.

The letter added: “The work you do can put you at odds with a wide range of ideologies and views and a small minority of hostile individuals may be motivated by grievances that are difficult to detect and whose actions are difficult. predictable.”

They said a “trained and accredited security guard will be available to visit surgeries in your constituency.”

Advertising



Source link

Previous Ganesh Chaturthi: animal slaughter banned in Bengaluru on September 10; celebrations limited to 3 days
Next PrimeSafe investigates cattle slaughter near Geelong

No Comment

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *